On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:32:26PM -0400, Robert M. Love wrote:
> I and another user thought the problem was in hid_input_field, but upon
> looking I now think not.
It is, check against hid.c in 2.4.5, the new code &&'s the first 2 if statements and
so it
now checks non-zero HID_MAIN_INPUT_RELATIVE values for new and old being
the same, which AFAICT, they can and often will be.
Patch against ac6 reverts back to original hid.c check :-
--- ../linux.orig/drivers/usb/hid-core.c Sat Jun 2 21:47:35 2001
+++ drivers/usb/hid-core.c Sat Jun 2 21:46:00 2001
@@ -773,10 +773,11 @@
if (HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE & field->flags) {
- if ((field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_RELATIVE) && !value[n])
- continue;
- if (value[n] == field->value[n])
- continue;
+ if (field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_RELATIVE) {
+ if (!value[n]) continue;
+ } else {
+ if (value[n] == field->value[n]) continue;
+ }
hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n], value[n]);
continue;
}
--
Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
