On 07/27/2013 12:18 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Andy reported that if file page get reclaimed we loose soft-dirty bit
> if it was there, so save _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY bit when page address
> get encoded into pte entry. Thus when #pf happens on such non-present
> pte we can restore it back.
> 
> Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcu...@openvz.org>
> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xe...@parallels.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Matt Mackall <m...@selenic.com>
> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---

> @@ -57,17 +57,25 @@ static int install_file_pte(struct mm_st
>               unsigned long addr, unsigned long pgoff, pgprot_t prot)
>  {
>       int err = -ENOMEM;
> -     pte_t *pte;
> +     pte_t *pte, ptfile;
>       spinlock_t *ptl;
>  
>       pte = get_locked_pte(mm, addr, &ptl);
>       if (!pte)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     if (!pte_none(*pte))
> +     ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
> +
> +     if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SOFT_DIRTY
> +             if (pte_present(*pte) &&
> +                 pte_soft_dirty(*pte))

I think there's no need in wrapping every such if () inside #ifdef CONFIG_...,
since the pte_soft_dirty() routine itself would be 0 for non-soft-dirty case
and compiler would optimize this code out.

> +                     pte_file_mksoft_dirty(ptfile);
> +#endif
>               zap_pte(mm, vma, addr, pte);
> +     }
>  
> -     set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pgoff_to_pte(pgoff));
> +     set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptfile);
>       /*
>        * We don't need to run update_mmu_cache() here because the "file pte"
>        * being installed by install_file_pte() is not a real pte - it's a
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to