At Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:25:24 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Felipe Tonello wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> > What I'd expect to happen here is that for multi function jacks we > > >> > create a control per function if the controls are valid. > > > Ok, so the idea is just to change the control to type integer instead > > of boolean, right? > > Because as you say, the user will be able to check the type of jack > > based on the status value, right? > > It might be more idiomatic and more compatible with userspace to create > multiple controls for the jack, there was some discussion of this in the > past I think but I can't remember the result.
I also forget the end result :) Another option would be to make an enum control, but multiple boolean controls are easier in the end. The headset controls of HD-audio are represented in that way, too (because HD-audio specification can't tell better). Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
