(2013/07/27 2:25), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Hello. > > Testing: seems to work, but assumes that debugs was fixed too. Hopefully > "debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely on list_empty(d_subdirs)" > is fine. > > (We should probably make debugfs_remove_recursive() to return the error > and trace_events.c should warn if it fails) > > However: I am still testing this patches, so this is still mostly for > review. I'll report if I find anything, but to remind we have other > bugs which need more fixes. And in fact I need to re-read this series > to convince myself it should work, I was distracted by the unexpected > problem in debugfs. > > Changes: a lot but all cosmetic, addresses the comments from Steven. > > Steven, 1/6 was not changed, I assume you agreed with my reply. > > Masami, I'll appreciate your review ;)
I think this is OK except for the bisecting issue, as I pointed in reply to 6/6. ;) Thank you! -- Masami HIRAMATSU IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
