(2013/07/26 5:04), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> To simplify the review, this is how it looks with the patch applied:
> 
> v2. We can use simply use list_for_each_entry_safe() and
> list_next_entry() should be calles under ->i_mutex. Although
> debugfs_remove_recursive() can race with itself anyway, but
> still.
> 
> And the code looks much simpler. But I do not know what did
> I miss.
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> void debugfs_remove_recursive(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
>       struct dentry *child, *next, *parent;
> 
>       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
>               return;
> 
>       parent = dentry->d_parent;
>       if (!parent || !parent->d_inode)
>               return;
> 
>       parent = dentry;
>  down:
>       mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(child, next, &parent->d_subdirs, d_u.d_child) {

Perhaps, you can use list_for_each_entry_safe_continue() here, as below.

        parent = dentry;
down:
        child = list_first_entry_or_null(&parent->d_subdirs,
                                         typeof(*child), d_u.d_child);
        mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);

restart:
        list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(child, next, &parent->d_subdirs, 
d_u.d_child) {

>               if (!debugfs_positive(child))
>                       continue;
> 
>               /* XXX: simple_empty(child) instead ? */
>               if (!list_empty(&child->d_subdirs)) {
>                       mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
>                       parent = child;
>                       goto down;
>               }
>  up:
>               __debugfs_remove(child, parent);
>       }

Then, you can avoid jumping into the loop, just restart it from
parent as below.

        mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);

        child = parent;
        parent = parent->d_parent;
        mutex_lock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
        __debugfs_remove(child, parent);

        if (child != dentry)
                goto restart;

>       mutex_unlock(&parent->d_inode->i_mutex);
>       simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> }

It's just an idea, which came up to my mind. :)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to