On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:34:49 -0500, Jon Loeliger <j...@jdl.com> wrote: > > > > Is there a schema out there in the wild that exemplifies what you mean? > > > > Not really. The format of schemas is currently in design stage. I'm > > currently rethinking some details of what I have in my mind. Give me some > > more time and I will post an RFC to the ML with all that written down. > > ...and... > > > > The schema-check idea reminds me of the W3C HTML validators: > > > > > > http://validator.w3.org/ > > > > > > Since device-tree source looks a bit like XML (or maybe more like JSON), > > > will be the schemas be similar in spirit to DTDs, and is it helpful to > > > think of the validator in this spirit? Or will the checker be more > > > like "gcc -Wall", since it will be invoked by a compiler? > > > > My idea is to implement compile time verification in dtc, so I guess it > > will be more like the latter. Since dts is what dtc can already parse, my > > plan is to keep the schemas in spirit to dts, just modifying/extending it > > to allow specifying bindings with them, rather than static values. > > > > Best regards, > > Tomasz > > It is possible to add some-damn XML DTD parsing and
/me runs screaming. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
