Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> writes: > We could just unconditionally increase the alignement in > intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj - we already have more strict requirements due > to a bunch of w/a in other places. So shouldn't hurt at all really.
That seems like a fine plan; 32kB isn't that onerous. Do you want the trivial patch to do this from me then? -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpNWsItKZFPE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
