On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> What is the baseline for this patch?
Hi!
it's x86/jumplabel branch, as a followup to commit
fd4363fff3d96 ("x86: Introduce int3 (breakpoint)-based instruction
patching") sitting there.
This branch however seems to be broken by Ingo's mismerge; this e-mail
from earlier today:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/147
implied that he fixed this ("all is fine"), however x86/jumplabel still
contains just 3/3 of Masami's series, and therefore is broken; 3/3 is not
enough, it needs also
kprobes/x86: Remove an incorrect comment about int3 in NMI/MCE
kprobes/x86: Use text_poke_bp() instead of text_poke_smp*()
included or
kprobes/x86: Remove unused text_poke_smp() and text_poke_smp_batch()
functions
dropped to be in consistent state again.
I pinged Ingo about this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/281
but the branch still seems to be in an odd state, containing last patch of
Masami's series.
Thanks in advance for fixing this and applying mi fix as well,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
