On 07/18/2013 03:54 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Let's shift this discussion away from the terms "abuse" and
> "professionalism" to "respect" and "civility".

And Daniel Philips replied:
> Brilliant, and +1 for a session at KS. In the mean time, why don't we 
> all try to demonstrate the real meaning of respect and civility, by 
> practising it henceforth on LKML

+1 from me too. Using the right terms will help us have a discussion that
focusses on the issues that matter - and avoid getting side-tracked by
things that don't.

Some thoughts on the format of the discussion at KS:

1) Keep it real
    We could come up with hypothetical scenarios on what things people *might* 
say, and
    how you *might* react and talk for days.  Let's stick to things that 
actually happened.
    (people's feelings/emotions on seeing specific posts count as "actually 
happened" for
     this - even if they didn't post a reply ... perhaps especially if they 
didn't post).
2) Keep it personal
    An extension of keeping it real - none of us represents the thoughts and 
opinions of
    *every* other developer with whom we share some attribute.  Sarah doesn't 
speak
    for all young cool programmers any more than I speak for all old uncool 
ones :-). So stick
    to your own stories, or those of specific people that can't be at KS but 
ask for their
    tales to be told. [Not sure how well I expressed this one ... I'm trying to 
avoid the
    issue where someone gets fired up with indignation on behalf of someone 
else ... who
    isn't actually bothered by whatever happened].
3) Don't bring up ancient history
    From the discussions on this, it looks like many people believe that things 
are better
    than they were just a few years ago.  Unless someone has the desire to do 
some
    month-by-month survey and disproves this perception - let's pretend we have 
a
    one or two year statute of limitations and not keep feuds going for 
(internet) generations.
4) Perfect is the enemy of good
    Or "You can't please all of the people all of the time". No matter what we 
do there
    will still be some unhappy people. Life is like that. But we can almost 
certainly
    make more of the people happier for most of the time. So our goal isn't to 
solve
    every possible problem (we need to save some topics for future KS :-) we 
just
    want to make things better than they are, while still allowing for 
criticism of code.
 
-Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to