Gu Zheng <guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
> As we remove the target single node, so list_for_each is enought, in order to
> clean up, we use list_for_each_entry instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 290db04..87f7bc2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ out:
>
> void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
> {
> - struct list_head *this, *next, *head;
> + struct list_head *head;
> struct orphan_inode_entry *orphan;
>
> mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex);
> head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list;
> - list_for_each_safe(this, next, head) {
> - orphan = list_entry(this, struct orphan_inode_entry, list);
> + list_for_each_entry(orphan, head, list) {
> if (orphan->ino == ino) {
> list_del(&orphan->list);
> kmem_cache_free(orphan_entry_slab, orphan);
you have meant list_for_each_entry_safe, haven't you?
--
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
