3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>

commit e7676a704ee0a1ef71a6b23760b5a8f6896cb1a1 upstream.

The filesystem should not be marked inconsistent if ext4_free_blocks()
is not able to allocate memory.  Unfortunately some callers (most
notably ext4_truncate) don't have a way to reflect an error back up to
the VFS.  And even if we did, most userspace applications won't deal
with most system calls returning ENOMEM anyway.

Reported-by: Nagachandra P <nagachan...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4735,11 +4735,16 @@ do_more:
                 * blocks being freed are metadata. these blocks shouldn't
                 * be used until this transaction is committed
                 */
+       retry:
                new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_free_data_cachep, GFP_NOFS);
                if (!new_entry) {
-                       ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
-                       err = -ENOMEM;
-                       goto error_return;
+                       /*
+                        * We use a retry loop because
+                        * ext4_free_blocks() is not allowed to fail.
+                        */
+                       cond_resched();
+                       congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
+                       goto retry;
                }
                new_entry->efd_start_cluster = bit;
                new_entry->efd_group = block_group;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to