Em Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu: > Arnaldo, > > I noticed you applied the patch to acme/perf/core, but it should be > instead in urgent since mainline is broken.
I did it because there are alternative ways to build the tools that don't require this fix, i.e. this is not _strictly_ needed to build the tools. What do you guys think: a case like this always needs to go to the current release candidate? Ingo? - Arnaldo > On 17.07.13 18:10:51, Robert Richter wrote: > > On 17.07.13 17:40:01, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:31:18PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Humm, probably it will look at the top level 'install' target? There > > > > was some discussion about this, right? Can you refresh my mind? > > Now tested with: > > make O=... DESTDIR=... tools/perf > make O=... DESTDIR=... tools/perf_install > make O=... DESTDIR=... -C tools/ perf > make O=... DESTDIR=... -C tools/ perf_install > make O=... DESTDIR=... -C tools/perf > make O=... DESTDIR=... -C tools/perf install > make tools/perf > make DESTDIR=... tools/perf_install > make -C tools/ perf > make -C tools/ DESTDIR=... perf_install > make -C tools/perf > make -C tools/perf DESTDIR=... install > > No issues noticed, accept that doc is built when running the 'install' > target, not 'all'. > > Will look at this. > > We also should remove dependencies from install targets that trigger a > rebuild since 'make install' is run as root. I had a conversation with > Linus about this for building the arm kernel, but the same applies > also for perf tools. I don't have the time for changing this now, but > maybe in some weeks or so. > > Thanks, > > -Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/