From: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
There is no need to use a normal per-CPU workqueue for delayed power downs
as they're not timing or performance critical and waking up a core for them
would defeat some of the point.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index b6efead..6ef476f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1891,8 +1891,9 @@ int regulator_disable_deferred(struct regulator
*regulator, int ms)
rdev->deferred_disables++;
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
- ret = schedule_delayed_work(&rdev->disable_work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(ms));
+ ret = queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
+ &rdev->disable_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(ms));
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
else
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
