Hi, Peter Davidlohr has tested the v3 patch set and it work well as reported (and in my test too), I thing your patch has solved the issue he found in v2 :)
Thus I think v3 is ready for next step now, I wish it has not yet been removed out of your apply-queue ;-) Regards, Michael Wang On 07/15/2013 01:57 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: [snip] > > Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you reminded me since I already had the > data. >> >> I suppose the issue have been addressed, but please let us know if v3 >> also show regression on your box, we could try to solve the problem ;-) > > It has, high_systime no longer shows a hit and all workloads remain > basically the same. > > Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> > > Thanks. > >> >> Regards, >> Michael Wang >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Michael Wang >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Davidlohr >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >>> the body of a message to [email protected] >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >>> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
