On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:34:08AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > The series seems pretty stable under QEMU, but I have no real hardware > on which to test -- the whole reason I'm interested in QEMU of course. > So I'm hoping that someone will notice this and help me out with testing.
Tested the patch series applied against 3.10.1 on a 3-CPU ES45. System came up fine but I noticed date was wrong and had been reset back to the start of the epoch (Jan 1 1970). Appears it is not reading hardware clock correctly on boot. I manually set the clock to the correct time but noticed it is running slow, indeed in a period of 60s the system clock incremented by 21s (+/-1s) so would appear clock is running slow by a factor given by the number of CPUs. Cheers Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
