On 07/16/2013 12:20 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:12 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > >> > Hello Frederic and Ingo: > Are you trying to go around me? I wrote this code and I'm one of the > maintainers for it. Your issue is very minor, and can wait till other > things get done first. > > You said my previous patch fixed your problem, right? Then I'll add your > tested by and push it in due course. > > I'll also get around to adding __init's to other functions too. But it > is *very* low on the totem pole of importance. >
I only provide my suggestions (or recommendations) which I think might be useful for us, and I don't care about whether you accept or not. If you want discuss, we can continue, if you won't (now, I guess so), you can just provide your choice is OK. >> > >> > Could you provide your suggestions or completions for it ? >> > >> > The trace_selftest_startup_* funcitons are mostly added by you without >> > '__init', do you have additional considerations about it (intend to have >> > no '__init') ? >> > >> > If no reply, I recommend to keep no '__init': apply this patch or >> > regress part of the patch "f1ed7c7 ftrace: Do not run selftest if >> > command line parameter is set" (at least, it can avoid related warnings >> > and treat all *selftest* fair). > It's a compile time warning that's a false positive. Not a run time > crash or other issue of importance. It can wait, relax. Otherwise you > are starting to become annoying. At least this patch is not 'urgent' (not a run time crash, or other issue of 'urgent'), but every members have their own opinions to treat this issue whether 'important' or not ('important' != 'urgent'). And every members' time resources are expensive (not only you, but also me, and other members). When I got none-reply, I don't know what happened (whether you agree, or not, what I said correct or incorrect ?), it is a polite to give a confirmation reply to tell whether you accept or not. Thanks. -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/