On 07/15/2013 01:57 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote: > On 2013年07月12日 06:15, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Commit a66b2e (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume) caused >> some subtle regressions in the cpufreq subsystem during suspend/resume. >> This patchset is aimed at rectifying those problems, by fixing the regression >> as well as achieving the original goal of that commit in a proper way. >> >> Patch 1 reverts the above commit, and is CC'ed to stable. >> >> Patches 2 - 5 reorganize the code and have no functional impact, and can go >> in as general cleanups as well. This reorganization builds a base that the >> rest of the patches will make use of. >> >> Patch 6 and 7 add a mechanism to perform light-weight init/tear-down of CPUs >> in the cpufreq subsystem and finally patch 8 uses it to preserve sysfs files >> across suspend/resume. >> >> All the patches apply on current mainline. >> >> >> Robert, Durgadoss, it would be great if you could try it out and see if it >> works >> well for your usecase. I tested it locally and cpufreq related files did >> retain >> their permissions across suspend/resume. Let me know if it works fine in your >> setup too. >> >> And I'd of course appreciate to hear from Dirk, Tianyu and Toralf to know >> whether their systems work fine after: >> a. applying only the first commit (this is what gets backported to stable) >> b. applying all the commits > > Hi, I tested this patchset on my machine and the issue in bug 59781 has > been resolved. > > Tested-by: Tianyu Lan <tianyu....@intel.com> >
Awesome! Thanks a lot! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
