Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Oops, oh wait, there's already another open point: your breakage > examples both rely on opening ".". You're right, "." should always be > a directory and I believe that's enforced by the VFS. So we don't have > an example of breakage yet. That's just because I did a simple "ls". But it doesn't make a difference. The magicdevs _are_ directories and chdir("magicdev"); open(".", O_RDONLY); shouldn't open the device. Ciao, ET. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are ... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are ... Edgar Toernig
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Edgar Toernig
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Edgar Toernig
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Edgar Toernig
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Marko Kreen
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/... Alexander Viro