On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Yeah, I guess the way Linux 2.2 balances things is way too
> experimental ;)
Ehh.. Take a look at the other differences between the VM's. Which may
make a 2.2.x approach completely bogus.
And take a look at how long the 2.2.x VM took to stabilize, and how
INCREDIBLY BAD some of those kernels were.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, balancing &... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, ba... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock rem... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock rem... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, ba... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, ba... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock rem... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, ba... Rik van Riel
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [with-PATCH-really] highmem deadlock removal, ba... Linus Torvalds
- Linux-2.4.5 Linus Torvalds

