On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:20:17PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/07/09 17:07), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:01:45PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> + if (wait) {
> >> + /*
> >> + * synchronize with kprobe_trace_func/kretprobe_trace_func
> >> + * to ensure disabled (all running handlers are finished)
> >> + */
> >> + synchronize_sched();
> >> + kfree(link); /* Ignored if link == NULL */
> >> + }
> >
> > What's not clear to me from this comment is if we're only waiting for
> > kfree()?
> > In that case shouldn't we use call_rcu() to free the thing? Or do we need
> > the
> > sync_sched() for other purposes as well?
>
> No, this is not only for kfree, but also to ensure completing
> disabling process, because trace_remove_event_call() supposes
> that for releasing event_call related objects (Those objects
> will be accessed in the handlers).
Then may I kindly suggest you clarify this in the comment? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
