On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:43:25AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 14:16 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: > > > > > PeterZ has suggested some optimization which I sent out yesterday, I > > > suppose they haven't been included into this test yet, correct? > > > > No, that was with both v3 patches applied. hackbench -l 1000 delta > > tracked to next pull/build fwiw, but I don't see anything noteworthy > > elsewhere, so I'm filing it under "tasks/core ~= zillion ~= hohum". > > OK, I'll apply the patches, we'll see what happens. If there significant > fallout we'll immediately have more information anyway ;-)
Yup. It's a repeatable oddity on my box, but it doesn't even track to itself when using different hackbench parameters. All I can really conclude from test results is "golly, changing stuff affects stuff" :) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
