* Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Op 03-07-13 02:54, Linus Torvalds schreef:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> Please pull the latest core-mutexes-for-linus git tree from:
> >>
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> >> core-mutexes-for-linus
> >>
> >> HEAD: 166989e366ffa66108b2f37b870e66b85b2185ad locking-selftests:
> >> Handle unexpected failures more strictly
> >>
> >> This tree adds support for wound/wait style locks, which the graphics guys
> >> would like to make use of in the TTM graphics subsystem.
> > So I pulled this, but I'm not particularly happy with how this (very
> > unusual) lock pollutes <linux/mutex.h> that pretty much every single
> > file ends up including.
> >
> > So I'd really prefer to see the ww_mutex() support split up into
> > <linux/ww_mutex.h>, rather than making the compiler have to parse and
> > remember that stuff when 99.99% of all files do not care about it or
> > need it.
>
> Sounds good to me, but can it wait until with the drm pull is done?
The ordering should not matter much as the combination will be tested in
linux-next anyway.
> Preliminary diff below.
Looks good to me at first sight. Please send a tested, changelogged,
signed off version.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
