The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information
related to boost support.

When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the
boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes were
exported.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo....@samsung.com>

---
Changes for v5:
- None

Changes for v4:
- None

Changes for v3:
- Remove low level boost code
- Move boost management code to cpufreq core code
- Use boost_supported flag to indicate if driver supports over clocking

Changes for v2:
- Removal of struct cpufreq_boost
- Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag
- low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported

 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 0d32f02..4f42fcc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
 
 static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = {
        &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
+       &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs,
        NULL,
 };
 
@@ -287,6 +288,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
 
 static int __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
 {
+       struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
        int ret = -EINVAL;
 
        exynos_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct exynos_dvfs_info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -317,6 +319,8 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
        }
 
        locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
+       if (of_property_read_bool(node, "boost_mode"))
+               exynos_driver.boost_supported = 1;
 
        register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to