On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 10:21:09 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have compared both mm/memcontrol.c files from
> next-20130703/next-20130704 - they are identical.
>
> These hunks...
>
> [ From Li Zefan ]
> @@ -6332,8 +6341,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup *cont)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>
> - mem_cgroup_sockets_destroy(memcg);
> -
> + memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
> __mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
> }
>
> [ From mmots ]
> @@ -6399,8 +6408,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct c
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
>
> - mem_cgroup_sockets_destroy(memcg);
> -
> + memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
> mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> }
>
> ...seems to differ.
>
> In both mentioned -next releases there exist no mem_cgroup_put() in
> mm/memcontrol.c.
> So the hunk in mmots seems to be wrong in my eyes.
Seems right - thanks for catching that.
---
a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-use-css_get-put-when-charging-uncharging-kmem-fix-fix-fix
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6409,7 +6409,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct c
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
- mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+ __mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
