On 07/03, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > No, I would avoid any changes to the debugfs infrastructure.
YEs, agreed. > OK, what about the below patch, followed by an updated version of your > patch. I'll send that as a reply to this one. Steven, you do understand that I can't review the changes in this area. But at first glance, _I think_ this should work. And this is much simpler, ->open() blocks trace_remove_event_call() (you added TRACE_EVENT_FL_REF_MASK check into the next patch). Which tree this patch is based on? I have pulled linux-trace.git#for-next and I do not see tracing_open_generic_file/etc in trace_events.c. I do not understand what protects call->flags, I guess there is another lock which I do not see in my tree? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
