This patch shares s_next and s_stop between slab and slub.

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/slab.c        | 10 ----------
 mm/slab.h        |  3 +++
 mm/slab_common.c |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 13f5ecc..bd14ea2 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -4433,16 +4433,6 @@ static int leaks_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void *s_next(struct seq_file *m, void *p, loff_t *pos)
-{
-       return seq_list_next(p, &slab_caches, pos);
-}
-
-static void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
-{
-       mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
-}
-
 static const struct seq_operations slabstats_op = {
        .start = leaks_start,
        .next = s_next,
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index f96b49e..95c8860 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -271,3 +271,6 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
 #endif
 
 };
+
+void *s_next(struct seq_file *m, void *p, loff_t *pos);
+void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p);
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 2d41450..d161b81 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -531,12 +531,12 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
        return seq_list_start(&slab_caches, *pos);
 }
 
-static void *s_next(struct seq_file *m, void *p, loff_t *pos)
+void *s_next(struct seq_file *m, void *p, loff_t *pos)
 {
        return seq_list_next(p, &slab_caches, pos);
 }
 
-static void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
+void s_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
 {
        mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to