Sorry for making noise. I've made a mistake and please ignore this patch.
On 07/02/2013 12:29 AM, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> In function cache_alloc_refill, we have used BUG_ON to ensure
> that slabp->inuse is less than cachep->num before the while
> test. And in the while body, we do not change the value of
> slabp->inuse and cachep->num, so it is not necessary to test
> if slabp->inuse < cachep->num test for every loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 8ccd296..c2076c2 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -3004,7 +3004,7 @@ retry:
> */
> BUG_ON(slabp->inuse >= cachep->num);
>
> - while (slabp->inuse < cachep->num && batchcount--) {
> + while (batchcount--) {
> STATS_INC_ALLOCED(cachep);
> STATS_INC_ACTIVE(cachep);
> STATS_SET_HIGH(cachep);
--
Thanks.
Zhang Yanfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
