On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:58:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Well reiserfs is probably a very bad choice at this point. It > does not have any bad blocks support (yet), so as soon as you have > a bad block you are stuck. reiserfs doesn't, but the HD usually has transparently in its firmware. So it hits a bad block; you see an IO error and the next time you hit the block the firmware has mapped in a fresh one from its internal reserves. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Dying disk and filesystem choice. monkeyiq
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Hans Reiser
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Andreas Dilger
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Andi Kleen
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Jens Axboe
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. monkeyiq
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Jonathan Lundell
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Jonathan Lundell
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Andi Kleen
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choic... Jonathan Lundell
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Hans Reiser
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. David Rees
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choice. Erik Mouw
- Re: Dying disk and filesystem choic... Hans Reiser