On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard > > <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > >> The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ? > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the > > > patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to > > > 3.11? > > > > > > (And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?) > > > > This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will > > produce warnings at boot. > > > > Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and > > re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference? > > Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread > is about. > > This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were > merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix? > Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described, > and not how they look either.
As Olof's warning downgrade is being merged (thanks for that and apologies for failing to explain patches dependencies properly and stable related issues), 7764/1 won't apply cleanly anymore. Can you please drop it from the patch system, I will update it and test it first thing tomorrow and send a final version to the patch system. Thank you very much, Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
