Due to recent changes and expecations of proper cpu bindings, there are
now cases for many of the in-tree devicetrees where a WARN() will hit
on boot due to badly formatted /cpus nodes.

Downgrade this to a pr_warn() to be less alarmist, since it's not a
new problem.

Tested on Arndale, Cubox, Seaboard and Panda ES. Panda hits the WARN
without this, the others do not.

Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net>
---

Linus, please apply directly for 3.10 if there is still time. Thanks!


-Olof

 arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
index 0905502..5859c8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/devtree.c
@@ -152,9 +152,10 @@ void __init arm_dt_init_cpu_maps(void)
                tmp_map[i] = hwid;
        }
 
-       if (WARN(!bootcpu_valid, "DT missing boot CPU MPIDR[23:0], "
-                                "fall back to default cpu_logical_map\n"))
+       if (!bootcpu_valid) {
+               pr_warn("DT missing boot CPU MPIDR[23:0], fall back to default 
cpu_logical_map\n");
                return;
+       }
 
        /*
         * Since the boot CPU node contains proper data, and all nodes have
-- 
1.8.1.192.gc4361b8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to