On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:45:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:

> > Also, until I just actually _read_ that function; I assumed it would
> > compare p->numa_faults[src_nid] and p->numa_faults[dst_nid]. Because
> > even when the dst_nid isn't the preferred nid; it might still have more
> > pages than where we currently are.
> > 
> 
> I tested something like this and also tested it when only taking shared
> accesses into account but it performed badly in some cases.  I've included
> the last patch I tested below for reference but dropped it until I figured
> out why it performed badly. I guessed it was due to increased bouncing
> due to shared faults but didn't prove it.

Oh, interesting. Yeah it would be good to figure out why that gave
funnies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to