On 06/28/2013 05:18 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 June 2013 13:18, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Time(ms) Old Freq(Hz) New Freq(Hz) CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
>> 175320 1400000 1400000 41 47 0 79
>
> We decided to left indent all entries here. I see only the first one
> like this. What about others?
>
OK, I'll modify it.
Time(ms) Old Freq(Hz) New Freq(Hz) CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
23165 200000 200000 2 0 0 0
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> index dc9b72e..a13bdf9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
>> @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>> struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
>> struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
>> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>
> A simple solution to your problem can be
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
>> + struct cpufreq_freqs freq;
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freq = {0};
>
>> +#endif
>> unsigned int max_load = 0;
>> unsigned int ignore_nice;
>> unsigned int j;
>> @@ -148,6 +151,9 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>> continue;
>>
>> load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
>> + freq.load[j] = load;
>> +#endif
>>
>> if (dbs_data->cdata->governor == GOV_ONDEMAND) {
>> int freq_avg = __cpufreq_driver_getavg(policy, j);
>> @@ -161,6 +167,15 @@ void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu)
>> max_load = load;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
>> + for_each_cpu_not(j, policy->cpus)
>> + freq.load[j] = 0;
>
> and remove this.
OK. I'll modify it as your comment.
>
>> + freq.time = ktime_to_ms(ktime_get());
>> + freq.old = policy->cur;
>> +
>> + cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freq, CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK);
>> +#endif
>
> If I remember well you had another instance where you were setting
> load as zero when wall time is less than idle time?
Right, I initailized CPUs load in for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) as zero.
The previous code couldn't initialize the load value of offline cpu.
But, This issue is resolved after applying following code as your comment.
> struct cpufreq_freqs freq = {0};
>
>> dbs_data->cdata->gov_check_cpu(cpu, max_load);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dbs_check_cpu);
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
>> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
>
>> +static int cpufreq_stats_create_debugfs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>
>> + /* Create debugfs directory and file for cpufreq */
>> + sprintf(buf, "cpu%d", policy->cpu);
>> + stat->debugfs_cpu = debugfs_create_dir(buf, debugfs_cpufreq);
>> + if (!stat->debugfs_cpu) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_alloc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!debugfs_create_file("load_table", S_IWUSR, stat->debugfs_cpu,
>> + policy, &load_table_fops)) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto err_debugfs;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_debugfs:
>> + debugfs_remove_recursive(stat->debugfs_cpu);
>> +err_alloc:
>> + kfree(stat->load_table);
>> +err:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> Can you describe a bit about the layout this will create in debugfs?
> I thought you will have a load_table file per policy->cpu ??
>
The debugfs_cpufreq is debugfs root directory (/sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq)
and debugfs_cpufreq has many child directory for Per-CPU debugfs according to
NR_CPUS number (/sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpuX).
Finally, Per-CPU debugfs create load_table debugfs file
(/sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpuX/load_table).
For example, only CPU0 create sysfs directory and file
(/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq)
and then other CPUx create link of created sysfs directory by CPU0 in
cpufreq_add_dev_symlink().
So, I'm considering whether to create link of CPUx's debugfs file except for
CPU0 as sysfs file.
- /sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpu1/
- /sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpu2/
- /sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpu3/
> Like: /sys/kernel/debug/cpufreq/cpu0/load_table
>
> Now in the show table function you are doing for_each_present_cpu()
> which may contain more cpus than are present in policy. Right?
>
You're right.
> Probably you need to do, for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)..
>
OK I'll modify it.
- A number of online CPU is 4
Time(ms) Old Freq(Hz) New Freq(Hz) CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
23165 200000 200000 2 0 0 0
23370 200000 200000 2 0 0 0
23575 200000 200000 2 0 1 0
23640 200000 200000 5 1 1 0
23780 200000 200000 3 0 1 0
23830 200000 200000 7 1 0 0
23985 200000 200000 1 0 0 0
24190 200000 200000 2 0 1 1
24385 200000 200000 2 0 0 0
24485 200000 200000 6 0 1 0
- A number of online CPU is 2
Time(ms) Old Freq(Hz) New Freq(Hz) CPU0 CPU3
37615 200000 200000 0 0
37792 200000 200000 0 5
38015 200000 200000 21 8
38215 200000 200000 0 0
38275 200000 200000 5 0
38415 200000 200000 15 3
38615 200000 200000 0 0
38730 200000 200000 1 0
38945 200000 200000 0 0
39155 200000 200000 1 1
> Also what will happen when governor isn't ondemand/conservative?
> We will still try to create this table? What will be present inside it?
>
I'm considering whether to check the kind of cpufreq governor for creating
load_table
in cpufreq_stats or execute dbs_check_cpu() on performance/powersave governor
to check
CPUx load. If you have opinion about this, I'd like to listen it.
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
