On Wed, 23 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > why not implement partitions as simply doing block remaps > > Everybody agrees. No they don't. We had this discussion already. We all agree. Maybe you read in "remap" something other than a simple addition but I don't. This is not a topic where further discussion is needed. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Wayne . Brown
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro