Martin Dalecki writes: > I fully agree with you. Good. Unfortunately I do not fully agree with you. > Most of the places where there kernel is passing kdev_t > would be entierly satisfied with only the knowlendge of > the minor number. My kdev_t is a pointer to a structure with device data and device operations. Among the operations a routine that produces a name. Among the data, in the case of a block device, the size, and the sectorsize, .. A minor gives no name, and no data. Linus' minor is 20-bit if I recall correctly. My minor is 32-bit. Neither of the two can be used to index arrays. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro