On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko Stübner wrote: > As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits > either in documentation or in the whole thought process. > > Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving > documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now. > > Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal > current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply > remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can > handle it correctly in dt.
Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future): Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> Cheers James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
