Hi, On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 07:04:31AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Looking at the locking and trying to think SMP (grunt) though, I > > don't like the thought of taking two locks for each page until > > > 100%. The data in that block is toast anyway. A big hairy SMP > > box has to feel reclaim_page(). (they probably feel the zone lock > > too.. probably would like to allocate blocks) > > Indeed, but this is a separate problem. Doing per-CPU private > (small, 8-32 page?) free lists is probably a good idea Ingo already implemented that for Tux2. Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 David Weinehall
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Jonathan Morton
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Scott Anderson
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 David Weinehall
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel