On 06/22, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 07:31:29PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > [ 7485.261299] WARNING: at include/linux/nsproxy.h:63 > get_proc_task_net+0x1c8/0x1d0() > > > > Hmm. The test case tries to create the symlink in /proc/*/net/ ? > > hit it with symlink, but also some other syscalls. eg:
Yes, this is fine, the warnings without lockup are not interesting. I thought that, perhaps, an exiting task can trigger this WARN() from task_work_run(). And this would be fine too! But this could provide more info if lockup happens after that. So please ignore. > > But it seems you can't ? > > > > Dave, I am sorry but all I can do is to ask you to do more testing. > > Could you please reproduce the lockup again on the clean Linus's > > current ? (and _without_ reverting 8aac6270, of course). > > I'll give it a shot. Just rebuilt clean tree, and restarted the tests. Thanks a lot. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
