Hi Alex,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Alex Shi <seak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 10:46 AM, Lei Wen wrote:
>>
>>
>> But here I have a question, there is another usage of
>> __synchronzie_entity_decay
>> in current kernel, in the switched_from_fair function.
>>
>> If task being frequently switched between rt and fair class, would it
>> also bring the
>> redundant issue? Do we need patch like below?
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index b5408e1..9640c66 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5856,7 +5856,7 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq,
>> struct task_struct *p)
>> */
>> if (p->se.avg.decay_count) {
>> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(&p->se);
>> - se->avg.last_runnable_update +=
>> + p->se.avg.last_runnable_update +=
>
> what tree does this patch base on?
I create the patch based on v3.9 kernel.
If it is ok, I could create a formal one based on latest kernel.
Thanks,
Lei
>> __synchronize_entity_decay(&p->se);
>> subtract_blocked_load_contrib(cfs_rq,
>> p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib);
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
