On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:17:33AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:15:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:20:35PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > > > > Here it is, a very basic test that runs a userspace loop for ten > > > > > seconds and dumps a trace > > > > > of the tick, scheduler, workqueue, and other kind of kernel noise. > > > > > > > > Excellent. Ticks are finally off here. Also has useful instructions on > > > > how > > > > to figure out if something was wrong. The number of >1 microsecond > > > > disturbances went down from 110 per second to 2. > > > > > > Very cool! > > > > > > Frederic, is the git tree mentioned in your email permanent? If so, I > > > will add it to the documentation. > > > > Yep, it should be permanent. > > How about the following? > > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > nohz_full: Add testing information to documentation > > This commit adds information about testing nohz_full, and also emphasizes > the fact that you need a multi-CPU system to get any benefit from nohz_full. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Nice! Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
