On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:57:40PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > On 06/17/2013 10:09 AM, akhil.go...@freescale.com wrote:
> >
> > This is interesting. We at Analog Devices are currently also working on a
> > driver for this part. We are using the Linux Industrial IO (IIO) framework
> > though, since the AD9361 is more or less a multifunction device implementing
> > different functions already covered by the IIO framework, like ADCs, DACs,
> > clock chips and so on.
>
> That's the "proper" api for this, not a bunch of chip-custom ioctls that
> aren't documented anywhere.
Depending on what functions there are in the device, it might actually be
better to make the chip itself an MFD device, and have sub-functions handled
by drivers/iio, drivers/clk, drivers/pwm etc. For the bigger picture I
definitely agree: it should use the existing subsystems whereever possible.
It may well be that a single IIO device is the right answer in this case,
but a new subsystem that covers the entire chip and adds a custom user
interface is almost certainly not.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
