On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:09:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:29:45PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Current code calls pm_runtime_suspended() in the interrupt handler to check
> > if the device is suspended or not. However, runtime PM status of the device
> > is only set to suspended once all PM runtime suspend hooks have executed.
> 
> > In our case we have the device bound to the ACPI power domain and its
> > runtime suspend hook will put the device to D3hot (or D3cold if possible).
> > This effectively means that the device is powered off before its state is
> > set to runtime suspended. During this time, it might get an interrupt that
> > is meant for another device (as the interrupt line is shared), and because
> > the device is powered off accessing its registers will return 0xffffffff
> > that the driver misinterprets as an invalid state. When this happens user
> > will see messages like below on the console:
> 
> This sounds like a problem which will affect a lot of devices and hence
> ought to be handled better by the PM core or at least frameworks in
> general.  Is it really device specific?

It's always been something that has been recommended to be dealt with
by the driver.  If reading the interrupt status you read ~0, then it
likely is because the device is powered down or removed from the system.

PCMCIA drivers have done this for years.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to