On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:50:55 -0400 J__rn Engel <jo...@logfs.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 June 2013 14:47:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote: > > > > Test program below is failing before these two patches and passing > > after. > > Actually, do we have a place to stuff kernel tests? And if not, > should we have one? Yep, tools/testing/selftests/vm. It's pretty simple and stupid at present - it anything about the framework irritates you, please fix it! General guidelines for tools/testing/selftests: the tool should execute quickly and shouldn't break the overall selftests run at either compile time or runtime if kernel features are absent, Kconfig is unexpected, etc. It's more a "place to accumulate and maintain selftest programs" than a serious self-testing framework. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
