On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 14:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:03:43PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Generally I think it's better that new submitters patches > > should go through more strict reviews and be as correct > > as possible. I think this is especially true for patches > > that are just checkpatch driven. > > I totally disagree, sorry.
I'm unsurprised. We have different tastes. While whitespace only cleanup patches have some use, for these types of patches, I'm more interested in educating others what sorts of patches have higher value. o defects o style/readability o whitespace As always, ymmv. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
