"Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Don't get me wrong. I'm NOT opposed to having a config tool everyone and > > their aunt can use. I'm opposed to that tool taking away the options expert > > users have to do what they know is right for them. > > I'll take that as a vote for (b), to handle even perverse configurations > even if it means adding a lot of complexity to the ruleset. In my opinion, no configuration that is actually physically possible is perverse. So if you go for (a) you can take this as a vote of NOOOOOO PLEASE LINUS DON'T - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Alan Cox
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Ben Ford
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Pete Zaitcev
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Ben Ford
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Arjan van de Ven
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Alan Cox
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Ben Ford
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Alan Cox
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Arjan van de Ven
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Arjan van de Ven
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Woodhouse
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Keith Owens
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Woodhouse
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Woodhouse
- Background to the argument about CML2 design phi... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design... Eric S. Raymond