From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>

Since we have an unlikely for the "current_order >= pageblock_order / 2"
test above, adding an unlikely for this "current_order >= pageblock_order"
test seems more appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/page_alloc.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index c3edb62..1b6d7de 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ __rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int 
start_migratetype)
                        rmv_page_order(page);
 
                        /* Take ownership for orders >= pageblock_order */
-                       if (current_order >= pageblock_order &&
+                       if (unlikely(current_order >= pageblock_order) &&
                            !is_migrate_cma(migratetype))
                                change_pageblock_range(page, current_order,
                                                        start_migratetype);
-- 
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to