On Thu, 17 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > possible miscompilation of smp_tune_scheduling:
> >     These versions of gcc
> >             gcc version 2.95.3 20010111
> >             gcc version 2.95.4 20010506
> 
> Does gcc 2.96 or the gcc 3.0 snapshot also show this problem ?

'gcc version 3.0 20010426' is fine.

I don't have 2.96 at the moment, but can install if necessary.

With the value of on_chip_cache unused, the block could be commented out.
If activated, the cpu->type should be masked (at least for our machines).

Anyone with better knowledge of the alpha's hwrpb than me, please check if
the value of cpu->type can be masked, e.g. to the lower 32 (8?) bits.

Greetings, Mike

-- 
Don't feed.                                               DI Michael Wildpaner
Don't provoke.                                                   Ph.D. Student
Don't enter the cage.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to