Sorry for replying late during these days, firstly.
On 06/10/2013 10:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote: > >> > >> > According to __internal_add_timer(), in _next_timer_interrupt(), when >> > 'tv1.vec' find one, but need 'cascade bucket(s)', we still need find >> > each slot of 'tv*.vec'. > No, we do not. We only need to scan the first cascade array after the > enqueued timer. If there is nothing in tv2 which might come before the > found timer, then any timer in tv3 will be later than the one we found > in the primary wheel. > OK, thanks, I should read details to confirm it (at least now, I still not quite be sure about it). >> > So need reset variable 'found', so can fully scan ''do {...} while()'' >> > for 'tv*.vec'. > And thereby lose the information, that we already found a timer in the > scan of the primary array. Hmm..., I should read details. And excuse me, I also have to do another things during these days, so maybe reply late. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/