On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:14:52PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 11:09:05AM -0500, Dave Chiluk wrote: > > Can't you just use the patch from my original e-mail? Anyhow I attached > > it an already signed-off patch. > > > > Al Viro Can you integrate it now? > > Applied... FWIW, patch directly in mail body is more convenient to deal with.
Actually, looking at that stuff... Why are we bothering with -EBUSY for removal of busy directories on ncpfs, anyway? It's not just rmdir(), it's overwriting rename() as well. IS_DEADDIR checks in fs/namei.c and fs/readdir.c mean that the only method of ncpfs directories that might get called after successful removal is ->setattr() and it would be trivial to add the check in ncp_notify_change() that would make it fail for dead directories without bothering the server at all... Related question: what happens if you open / unlink / fchmod on ncpfs? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
