Hi guys,
I think this patch is necessary. Please take a look at it.
Thanks
Zhen-Hua
On 05/24/2013 08:35 AM, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
In Intel Vt-D specs, Chapter 9.3 Page-Table Entry,
The size of ADDR(address) field is 12:51, but the function dma_pte_addr
treats it as 12:63.
Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-h...@hp.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/dma_remapping.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index b4f0e28..c6d2847 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -311,10 +311,10 @@ static inline void dma_set_pte_prot(struct dma_pte *pte,
unsigned long prot)
static inline u64 dma_pte_addr(struct dma_pte *pte)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
- return pte->val & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
+ return pte->val & DMA_PTE_MASK;
#else
/* Must have a full atomic 64-bit read */
- return __cmpxchg64(&pte->val, 0ULL, 0ULL) & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
+ return __cmpxchg64(&pte->val, 0ULL, 0ULL) & DMA_PTE_MASK;
#endif
}
diff --git a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
index 57c9a8a..7a1e212 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma_remapping.h
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#define DMA_PTE_WRITE (2)
#define DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE (1 << 7)
#define DMA_PTE_SNP (1 << 11)
+#define DMA_PTE_ADD_LENGTH (40)
+#define DMA_PTE_MASK ((((u64)1 << DMA_PTE_ADD_LENGTH) - 1) << VTD_PAGE_SHIFT)
#define CONTEXT_TT_MULTI_LEVEL 0
#define CONTEXT_TT_DEV_IOTLB 1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
