On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:16:16PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Alexander Gordeev <agord...@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> >> +/**
> >> + * irq_alloc_descs - allocate and initialize a range of irq descriptors
> >> + * @irq:     Allocate for specific irq number if irq >= 0
> >> + * @from:    Start the search from this irq number
> >> + * @cnt:     Number of consecutive irqs to allocate.
> >> + * @node:    Preferred node on which the irq descriptor should be 
> >> allocated
> >> + * @owner:   Owning module (can be NULL)
> >> + *
> >> + * Returns the first irq number or error code
> >> + */
> >> +int __ref
> >> +__irq_alloc_descs(int irq, unsigned int from, unsigned int cnt, int node,
> >> +               struct module *owner)
> >> +{
> >> +     int start;
> >> +
> >> +     start = __irq_reserve_irqs(irq, from, cnt);
> >> +
> >> +     if (start < 0)
> >> +             return start;
> >> +
> >> +     return alloc_descs(start, cnt, node, owner);
> >
> > I think alloc_descs() fail path is needed before return.
> 
> __irq_reserve_irqs already return -EEXIST etc,
> 
> old kernel is like:
> 
> >> @@ -380,12 +377,36 @@ __irq_alloc_descs(int irq, unsigned int from, 
> >> unsigned int cnt, int node,
> 
>        bitmap_set(allocated_irqs, start, cnt);
>        mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
>      return alloc_descs(start, cnt, node, owner);
> 
>  err:
>       mutex_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
>       return ret;
> 
> so i don't change the fail path handling.

I rather meant the bits should be unset in case alloc_descs() failed.
But I failed to notice alloc_descs() does it. Therefore..

Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agord...@redhat.com>

> Thanks
> 
> Yinghai

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agord...@redhat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to